Evaluating CPD Value: A Guide for Educators Attending Tech Conferences

Evaluating CPD Value: A Guide for Educators Attending Tech Conferences

You've secured approval to attend BETT UK 2026. You've blocked out time in your calendar. You're investing three days away from your classroom or institution. The critical question now: how do you evaluate whether this professional development investment is genuinely valuable?

With education budgets tight and professional time precious, educators need practical frameworks for assessing CPD quality—before, during, and after attendance. This guide provides exactly that: evidence-based criteria, evaluation tools, and strategic approaches to ensure your conference attendance delivers meaningful professional learning, not just certificates.

Why CPD Evaluation Matters

Many educators attend conferences, collect certificates, tick CPD boxes, and return to practice unchanged. This isn't just wasteful—it represents a failure of professional learning that ultimately impacts students.

Effective CPD evaluation serves three essential purposes:

1. Individual Professional Growth
Understanding what constitutes valuable professional development helps you select high-quality opportunities and avoid superficial training that wastes your time.

2. Institutional Decision-Making
When schools and trusts can demonstrate CPD impact, they make better-informed decisions about professional development investments and resource allocation.

3. Sector Improvement
Collective evaluation of CPD quality creates market pressure on providers to improve standards, raising the bar across the education sector.

The CPD Register exists precisely to address this evaluation challenge—providing independent certification that CPD accreditation organisations meet rigorous quality standards. But individual educators also need frameworks to evaluate specific learning opportunities.

Understanding CPD Quality: The Foundation

Before evaluating conference attendance, you need clear criteria for what constitutes quality professional development.

Research-Based Quality Indicators

Extensive research on effective teacher professional development identifies five core characteristics:

1. Content Focus
Quality CPD centres on subject matter, pedagogical approaches, or specific teaching practices—not generic skills divorced from classroom context.

Evaluation Question: Does this session address specific content or teaching practices I can apply in my classroom or institution?

2. Active Learning
Effective professional development engages educators as active learners through problem-solving, trying new approaches, analysing student work, or hands-on practice.

Evaluation Question: Will I actively engage with content, or passively listen to presentations?

3. Coherence
Valuable CPD aligns with educators' existing knowledge, institutional goals, curriculum requirements, and broader education reforms.

Evaluation Question: How does this connect to my current teaching challenges and institutional priorities?

4. Duration and Sustained Support
Meaningful professional learning extends beyond one-off sessions, providing sustained engagement and ongoing support for implementation.

Evaluation Question: How will I sustain learning and access support after the event?

5. Collective Participation
When educators from the same school or department engage in professional development together, they can support each other's learning and implementation.

Evaluation Question: Are colleagues attending? How will we collaborate on implementation?

The Quality Assurance Question

Beyond these characteristics, a crucial evaluation criterion is: Has this professional development been independently quality assured?

For BETT UK 2026 (21-23 January at ExCeL London), The CPD Group—a CPD Register Certified accreditation organisation—individually assesses the extensive programme of sessions, workshops, and seminars.

This means CPD-accredited sessions at BETT have been independently reviewed against published quality criteria. You can therefore approach these sessions knowing they meet professional standards for learning outcomes, evidence-based content, and accurate CPD hour calculations.

When attending any conference, ask: Who has assessed this content? Against what criteria? What does their quality assurance process actually involve?

Pre-Conference Evaluation: Selecting High-Value Sessions

The most critical CPD evaluation happens before you attend. Strategic session selection determines 70% of your conference value.

The Pre-Conference Evaluation Framework

Use this framework when reviewing any education conference programme:

1. Alignment Assessment

Your Context:

• What are your specific professional development goals?
• What challenges are you currently facing in your role?
• What institutional priorities must you support?
• What knowledge gaps or skills deficiencies are you addressing?

Session Evaluation:

• Does the session directly address your goals and challenges?
• Will content translate to your specific educational context?
• Does the complexity level match your current expertise?

Rating Scale: High Alignment (3) | Moderate Alignment (2) | Low Alignment (1) | No Alignment (0)

2. Quality Indicators Check

Learning Outcomes:

• ✅ Are specific, measurable learning outcomes clearly stated?
• ✅ Do outcomes focus on practical application, not just awareness?
• ✅ Can you determine exactly what you'll be able to do after attending?

Evidence Base:

• ✅ Is content grounded in research or proven practice?
• ✅ Does the session reference evidence or present anecdotal opinion?
• ✅ Will you gain access to resources and references?

Speaker Credentials:

• ✅ Does the speaker have relevant expertise and experience?
• ✅ Have they successfully implemented what they're presenting?
• ✅ Are they practitioners, researchers, or primarily vendors?

Format Appropriateness:

• ✅ Does the format suit the content? (Hands-on for technical skills, discussion for complex challenges, etc.)
• ✅ Will active learning opportunities be provided?
• ✅ Is the allocated time sufficient for meaningful engagement?

Quality Assurance:

• ✅ Has the session been independently assessed?
• ✅ Is CPD accreditation from a credible, certified organisation?
• ✅ Are assessment criteria transparent and published?

Rating Scale: Meets All Criteria (5) | Meets Most (4) | Meets Some (3) | Meets Few (2) | Meets None (1)

3. Practical Value Assessment

Implementation Feasibility:

• How realistic is implementation in your context?
• What resources, permissions, or support would you need?
• What barriers might prevent application of learning?

Cost-Benefit Analysis:

• What's the time investment? (Including travel, attendance, and follow-up)
• What's the opportunity cost? (What else could you do with this time?)
• What's the potential impact? (On your practice, your students, your institution)

Rating Scale: High Value (3) | Moderate Value (2) | Low Value (1) | Questionable Value (0)

4. Total Session Value Score

Calculate total value: (Alignment Score × 2) + Quality Score + (Practical Value × 2) = Maximum 20 points

Interpretation:

• 16-20 points: Priority session—essential attendance
• 11-15 points: High-value session—attend if schedule permits
• 6-10 points: Moderate value—attend only if aligned with specific need
• 0-5 points: Low value—skip in favour of higher-value opportunities

Applying the Framework to BETT UK 2026

Let's demonstrate this framework with hypothetical BETT sessions:

Example Session 1: "AI-Powered Differentiation: Practical Strategies for Mixed-Ability Classrooms"

• Alignment (for secondary school teacher focused on differentiation): High = 3 × 2 = 6 points
• Quality: Learning outcomes clear, evidence-based content, practitioner speaker, hands-on format, CPD accredited = 5 points
• Practical Value: Immediately implementable, minimal resources needed, high potential impact = 3 × 2 = 6 points
• Total: 17 points → Priority session

Example Session 2: "The Future of Education: Trends and Predictions"

• Alignment (for classroom teacher): Low = 1 × 2 = 2 points
• Quality: Vague outcomes, opinion-based, futurist speaker, lecture format, not accredited = 2 points
• Practical Value: Limited implementation, no immediate application = 1 × 2 = 2 points
• Total: 6 points → Skip in favour of practical sessions

This systematic approach prevents the common mistake of randomly selecting sessions or being drawn to entertaining speakers without evaluating actual professional learning value.

Creating Your Conference Schedule

After scoring all potential sessions:

Step 1: List all priority sessions (16-20 points)
Step 2: Check for schedule conflicts and select your highest-priority option
Step 3: Fill remaining time slots with high-value sessions (11-15 points)
Step 4: Build in break time—don't over-schedule
Step 5: Reserve time for exhibition exploration and networking

Remember: Three deeply engaged sessions delivering actionable learning provide more value than ten superficial sessions you barely remember.

During-Conference Evaluation: Real-Time Quality Assessment

Even well-planned sessions may disappoint. You need real-time evaluation skills to adapt your schedule when sessions fail to deliver expected value.

The 15-Minute Decision Rule

Within the first 15 minutes of any session, assess:

Content Quality:

• Are stated learning outcomes being addressed?
• Is content at the appropriate level? (Not too basic, not too advanced)
• Is information evidence-based or purely anecdotal?
• Is the presentation clear and well-organised?

Engagement Value:

• Are you actively engaged or passively listening?
• Is the format effective for the content?
• Are opportunities for questions and interaction provided?
• Is the speaker knowledgeable and credible?

Practical Relevance:

• Can you envision applying this in your context?
• Are specific, actionable strategies being shared?
• Will you gain resources, tools, or frameworks to use?

Decision Point: If a session scores poorly across these criteria, it's not failing you—it's failing to deliver professional development value. Give yourself permission to leave and attend an alternative session, explore the exhibition, or engage in networking that might provide more value.

Active Note-Taking for Evaluation and Implementation

Take notes that facilitate both evaluation and future implementation:

The Three-Column Method:

Example from Hypothetical BETT Session:

This approach captures content while simultaneously evaluating quality and planning implementation.

Collecting Evidence of CPD Value

During sessions, gather evidence to support later evaluation:

Documentation:

• Photograph slides containing key frameworks or resources (where permitted)
• Collect handouts, resources, and reference lists
• Obtain speaker contact information for follow-up questions
• Capture specific statistics, research citations, or case study details

CPD Certificates:

• Collect certificates from all accredited sessions attended
• Verify accurate CPD hours and learning outcomes
• Note the accrediting organisation (verify if CPD Register Certified)

Contact Information:

• Connect with other educators who found the session valuable
• Exchange details with speakers for follow-up questions
• Identify potential collaborators for implementation

Post-Conference Evaluation: Assessing Impact and Value

The most important evaluation happens after you return to your institution. Did conference attendance actually improve your practice?

Immediate Post-Conference Evaluation (Within 48 Hours)

Complete this reflection while memory is fresh:

Overall Conference Assessment:

1. Knowledge Gained (1-5): How much new, valuable knowledge did you acquire?
2. Skills Developed (1-5): What new skills or competencies did you develop?
3. Resources Obtained (1-5): What useful tools, materials, or contacts did you gain?
4. Inspiration & Motivation (1-5): How energised and motivated do you feel about your practice?
5. Strategic Insights (1-5): What new perspectives on education challenges did you gain?

Individual Session Evaluation:

For each session attended, rate:

Content Quality (1-5):

• 5 = Evidence-based, rigorous, comprehensive
• 3 = Adequate but not exceptional
• 1 = Superficial, anecdotal, poor quality

Practical Relevance (1-5):

• 5 = Directly applicable, immediately implementable
• 3 = Relevant but requires adaptation
• 1 = Not applicable to my context

Presentation Effectiveness (1-5):

• 5 = Engaging, clear, well-organised, active learning
• 3 = Adequate presentation, some engagement
• 1 = Poor presentation, passive listening only

Value for Time (1-5):

• 5 = Exceptional value, would highly recommend
• 3 = Adequate value, worth attending
• 1 = Waste of time, should have skipped

Total Session Score: Maximum 20 points

Interpretation:

• 16-20 points: High-value session—priority for implementation and sharing with colleagues
• 11-15 points: Good value—implement relevant elements
• 6-10 points: Limited value—extract any useful elements but don't prioritise
• 0-5 points: Poor value—provide feedback to organisers

Action Planning (Within One Week)

Transform evaluation into implementation:

Identify Top 3-5 Actionable Insights:

For each insight:

• What specifically will you implement?
• When will you start? (Be specific: "Week of 27 January")
• What preparation is needed? (Resources, permissions, training)
• How will you measure success? (What evidence will show impact?)
• Who needs to be involved? (Colleagues, leadership, students)

Example Implementation Plan:

Insight: Three-question formative assessment strategy
Implementation: Incorporate into all Year 10 history lessons
Start Date: First lesson back (29 January)
Preparation: Adapt questions to scheme of work (2 hours planning)
Success Measures: Student engagement in discussions, quality of responses, evidence of understanding
Stakeholders: Department colleagues (share strategy at next meeting)

Medium-Term Evaluation (3 Months Post-Conference)

After implementation attempts, assess actual impact:

Implementation Success:

• Which insights have you successfully implemented?
• What barriers prevented implementation of other insights?
• What adjustments were needed to fit your context?

Practice Change:

• How has your teaching or professional practice changed?
• What do you now do differently as a result of conference attendance?
• Which changes feel sustainable long-term?

Student Impact:

• What evidence suggests students have benefited?
• Have learning outcomes, engagement, or achievement improved?
• How do students respond to new approaches?

Professional Growth:

• How has your professional confidence or competence grown?
• What new professional connections have you maintained?
• How has your thinking about education challenges evolved?

Return on Investment:

• Was conference attendance worth the time and cost?
• What tangible benefits has your institution gained?
• Would you attend again or recommend to colleagues?

Evaluating Conference Quality Assurance: The CPD Register Lens

When evaluating any education conference, understanding the quality assurance framework behind CPD accreditation is crucial.

What to Look For: Quality Assurance Indicators

Individual Session Assessment:
Quality conferences (like BETT UK 2026) have each session individually assessed against published criteria. Blanket accreditation—where all content receives automatic approval—doesn't provide meaningful quality assurance.

Published Assessment Criteria:
Credible accreditation organisations publish transparent criteria explaining exactly what their accreditation represents. If you can't find clear assessment standards, that's a red flag.

Independent Accreditation:
Is CPD accreditation provided by an independent organisation with no commercial interest in session content? Vendor self-certification or pay-for-accreditation schemes lack credibility.

Accreditation Organisation Credentials:
Is the accrediting organisation itself certified by The CPD Register or another credible oversight body? This demonstrates commitment to quality standards and consumer protection.

Accurate CPD Hours:
Are CPD hours properly calculated based on actual learning time and effort, not just attendance duration?

Professional Recognition:
Do professional teaching bodies, regulatory bodies, or education institutions recognise the CPD accreditation?

The BETT UK 2026 Quality Assurance Model

BETT UK 2026's partnership with The CPD Group demonstrates conference quality assurance done right:

✅ Independent Assessment: The CPD Group is independent from BETT and session presenters
✅ Individual Review: Each session is assessed individually, not blanket-approved
✅ Published Criteria: Clear, transparent assessment standards
✅ CPD Register Certified: The CPD Group is certified by The CPD Register for quality standards
✅ Professional Integrity: Rigorous quality assurance, consumer protection, honest advertising

When evaluating other conferences, compare their quality assurance approach to this model.

Red Flags in Conference CPD Claims

Be sceptical when conferences:

❌ Claim "official" or "approved" CPD without specifying who approves or against what criteria
❌ Offer instant CPD certificates without requiring evidence of learning or attendance
❌ Lack transparent assessment criteria or refuse to explain their accreditation process
❌ Use pay-for-accreditation models where any provider can purchase CPD status
❌ Self-accredit without independent external assessment
❌ Over-award CPD hours disconnected from actual learning (e.g., 6 CPD hours for 1-hour presentation)
❌ Make unsubstantiated quality claims without evidence or third-party verification

These red flags indicate CPD accreditation that may be meaningless, potentially wasting your professional development time.

Creating Your Personal CPD Evaluation Toolkit

Develop reusable tools for evaluating all professional development:

Tool 1: Pre-Event Selection Matrix

Create a spreadsheet with columns for:

• Session title and description
• Alignment score (0-6)
• Quality indicators score (0-5)
• Practical value score (0-6)
• Total score (0-17)
• Priority ranking

Use this matrix for every conference you consider attending.

Tool 2: Session Evaluation Card

Create a template to complete during or immediately after each session:

Session Title: _______________
Date/Time: _______________
Speaker: _______________

Quick Ratings (1-5):
Content Quality: ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
Practical Relevance: ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
Presentation: ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
Value for Time: ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

Top 3 Takeaways:

Implementation Actions:

Resources/References:

Tool 3: CPD Impact Tracker

Maintain a professional learning journal documenting:

• All CPD activities engaged in (conferences, courses, reading, etc.)
• Initial evaluation scores and reflections
• Implementation attempts and outcomes
• Student impact evidence
• Practice changes sustained over time

Review quarterly to assess which types of CPD consistently deliver value for your professional growth.

Tool 4: Conference Comparison Framework

When deciding between multiple conference options, evaluate:

Conference Quality Indicators:

• Independent CPD accreditation? (Yes/No)
• Published assessment criteria? (Yes/No)
• Accreditation organisation certified? (Yes/No)
• Individual session assessment? (Yes/No)
• Accurate CPD hour calculations? (Yes/No)

Content Relevance:

• Alignment with professional development goals (1-5)
• Breadth of relevant sessions (1-5)
• Depth of technical/pedagogical content (1-5)

Learning Opportunities:

• Hands-on workshops and labs? (Yes/No)
• Networking and peer learning? (Yes/No)
• Expert speakers and researchers? (Yes/No)
• Exhibition exploration? (Yes/No)

Practical Logistics:

• Cost (including travel, accommodation, time) (1-5, lower is better)
• Accessibility and timing (1-5)
• Institutional support likely? (Yes/No)

Use this framework to make evidence-based decisions about conference attendance.

Institutional-Level CPD Evaluation

If you're in leadership or responsible for professional development strategy, evaluate conference attendance at institutional level:

Measuring Organisational Return on Investment

Input Metrics:

• Staff time invested (including travel and preparation)
• Financial costs (tickets, travel, accommodation, cover costs)
• Opportunity costs (other activities sacrificed)

Output Metrics:

• Number of staff attending
• Total CPD hours earned
• Sessions attended across different topics
• Contacts and partnerships established

Outcome Metrics:

• New practices implemented in classrooms
• Staff capability development in priority areas
• Technology or resource decisions informed
• Cross-institution knowledge sharing
• Student experience or achievement improvements

Impact Metrics:

• Sustained practice changes six months post-conference
• Measurable improvements in student outcomes
• Staff retention and job satisfaction
• Institutional reputation and capability

ROI Calculation:
Compare outputs, outcomes, and impacts against inputs. If conference attendance consistently fails to demonstrate positive ROI, reconsider your professional development strategy.

Building Institutional Evaluation Processes

Pre-Conference:

• Require staff to submit session plans and professional development goals
• Align conference attendance with school development plan priorities
• Set clear expectations for post-conference dissemination and implementation

Post-Conference:

• Schedule mandatory debriefs where attendees share key insights
• Require written reports documenting learning and implementation plans
• Support pilot implementations of promising approaches
• Track which insights are successfully embedded in practice

Annual Review:

• Evaluate cumulative impact of all conference attendance
• Identify which conferences consistently deliver value
• Adjust professional development budget allocations accordingly
• Consider institutional membership or sponsorship of high-value conferences

Common Evaluation Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Equating Enjoyment with Value

An entertaining speaker doesn't necessarily deliver valuable professional learning. Evaluate based on what you've learned and can apply, not how entertained you were.

Mistake 2: Collecting Certificates Without Implementation

CPD certificates are evidence of attendance, not evidence of learning or practice change. Value comes from implementation, not certification.

Mistake 3: Failing to Evaluate Until Much Later

Immediate evaluation captures details and nuances you'll forget within days. Delayed evaluation loses critical information.

Mistake 4: Over-Optimistic Implementation Plans

Identifying 20 things to implement guarantees implementing none. Focus on 3-5 high-impact, realistic changes.

Mistake 5: Ignoring Negative Evaluations

If a session was poor quality, that's valuable information. Report this to conference organisers and adjust future selection criteria accordingly.

Mistake 6: Not Considering Opportunity Cost

Attending one conference means not attending another or not engaging in alternative professional development. Consider what you're sacrificing.

Mistake 7: Individual Evaluation Only

Professional development has institutional impact. Evaluate not just personal learning but how conference attendance benefits your students and institution.

The Broader Context: Why Evaluation Drives Sector Improvement

Individual evaluation decisions collectively shape the CPD marketplace.

When educators systematically evaluate conference quality and choose high-value opportunities:

High-Quality Conferences Thrive:
Events like BETT UK 2026 that invest in independent quality assurance attract more attendees and stronger institutional support.

Low-Quality Providers Improve or Exit:
Conferences offering superficial content lose market share, creating pressure to improve standards or cease operations.

Quality Assurance Becomes Expected:
As educators demand independent CPD accreditation, it becomes market standard rather than differentiator.

Professional Development Standards Rise:
Overall quality of available CPD improves as providers recognise that quality assurance drives attendance.

Education Sector Benefits:
Better professional development leads to better teaching, better learning, and better outcomes for students.

This is exactly why The CPD Register exists: to bring transparency and quality standards to the CPD accreditation sector, empowering educators to make informed decisions about professional development.

Special Considerations for Different Educator Roles

Different roles require different evaluation emphases:

Classroom Teachers

Evaluation Focus:

• Direct classroom application and student impact
• Practical strategies requiring minimal resources
• Evidence-based pedagogical approaches
• Curriculum-specific content and methods

Priority Questions:

• Can I implement this in my classroom next week?
• Will this improve student learning or engagement?
• Do I need permission or resources I don't have?

School Leaders

Evaluation Focus:

• Strategic implementation at institutional level
• Change management and leadership insights
• Evidence of impact across multiple contexts
• Scalability and sustainability

Priority Questions:

• How would this work across our whole school?
• What change management would be required?
• What's the cost-benefit at institutional scale?

IT/Technology Leads

Evaluation Focus:

• Technical functionality and integration
• Data security and privacy considerations
• Training and support requirements
• Total cost of ownership

Priority Questions:

• Does this integrate with our existing systems?
• What ongoing costs and support are needed?
• Can we pilot before committing institution-wide?

School Business Leaders

Evaluation Focus:

• Cost-effectiveness and value for money
• Compliance and risk management
• Operational efficiency improvements
• Procurement considerations

Priority Questions:

• What's the true total cost?
• Does this solve a genuine operational problem?
• What's the implementation timeline and resource requirement?

Multi-Academy Trust Leaders

Evaluation Focus:

• Cross-trust standardisation opportunities
• Shared service potential
• Trust-wide professional development models
• Evidence of scalability across diverse contexts

Priority Questions:

• Could this work across all trust schools?
• What economies of scale could we achieve?
• How do we manage implementation across varied settings?

Preparing for BETT UK 2026: Your Evaluation Action Plan

With BETT UK 2026 approaching (21-23 January at ExCeL London), here's how to apply these evaluation principles:

Two Weeks Before (Week of 6 January)

✅ Register for free educator access if you haven't already
✅ Review the full programme at uk.bettshow.com
✅ Use the Pre-Event Selection Matrix to score and prioritise sessions
✅ Create your personalised schedule focusing on highest-value sessions
✅ Prepare your evaluation toolkit (note-taking templates, session evaluation cards)
✅ Set specific professional development goals for the event
✅ If attending with colleagues, coordinate session coverage and assign evaluation responsibilities

During BETT (21-23 January)

✅ Apply the 15-Minute Decision Rule to adapt schedule in real-time
✅ Use the Three-Column Note-Taking Method in every session
✅ Complete Session Evaluation Cards immediately after each session
✅ Collect CPD certificates and verify they're from The CPD Group (CPD Register Certified)
✅ Visit The CPD Group at Stand SS70 to discuss quality assurance
✅ Network intentionally—identify potential implementation partners
✅ Document exhibition discoveries—photograph solutions worth investigating

Immediately Post-BETT (Week of 27 January)

✅ Complete Overall Conference Assessment (within 48 hours)
✅ Calculate individual session scores and identify highest-value learning
✅ Upload all CPD certificates to professional portfolio or CPD Passport
✅ Share key insights with colleagues who didn't attend
✅ Create implementation action plan for top 3-5 insights
✅ Follow up with contacts made
✅ Send evaluation feedback to BETT organisers (positive and constructive)

Three Months Post-BETT (April 2026)

✅ Review implementation progress—what's been successfully embedded?
✅ Assess student impact—what evidence shows learning improved?
✅ Evaluate overall conference ROI—was attendance worthwhile?
✅ Document lessons learned for future conference planning
✅ Share success stories with colleagues to encourage their attendance at BETT 2027

Conclusion: From Evaluation to Empowerment

Effective CPD evaluation isn't bureaucratic box-ticking—it's professional empowerment.

When you systematically evaluate professional development quality, you:

Take Control of your professional growth rather than passively consuming whatever CPD is offered

Maximise Value from limited professional development time and budget

Drive Improvement in the CPD marketplace by rewarding quality and rejecting superficiality

Demonstrate Impact of professional learning to leadership, inspection frameworks, and professional bodies

Protect Your Time by avoiding low-quality opportunities that waste precious hours

Support Students by ensuring your professional learning translates to practice improvements that benefit learners

The CPD Register's partnership with BETT UK 2026, with The CPD Group providing independent quality assurance, represents conference professional development done right. But even with quality assurance in place, your individual evaluation—your strategic selection, active engagement, and committed implementation—determines whether conference attendance translates to meaningful professional growth.

As you prepare for BETT UK 2026, approach it not just as an attendee but as an evaluator, implementer, and professional learner. Use the frameworks, tools, and strategies in this guide to ensure your investment of time delivers genuine value.

Because ultimately, CPD evaluation isn't about judging conferences or sessions.

It's about ensuring your professional learning actually improves your practice and benefits your students.

And that's what truly matters.

Resources and Tools

Downloadable Evaluation Templates

Pre-Event Session Selection Matrix (Create in Excel/Google Sheets):

• Session title | Alignment Score | Quality Score | Practical Value | Total Score | Priority

Session Evaluation Card Template:

• Session details | Quick ratings | Top takeaways | Implementation actions | Resources

CPD Impact Tracker Template:

• Date | Activity | Initial evaluation | Implementation attempts | Student impact | Sustained changes

Recommended Reading

• Research on effective professional development characteristics
• The CPD Register quality framework: thecpdregister.com/standards
• Understanding CPD accreditation: The CPD Register certification directory

Contact Information

For questions about CPD quality evaluation:
The CPD Register: thecpdregister.com/contact

For questions about BETT UK 2026 CPD accreditation:
Visit The CPD Group at Stand SS70, or visit their website

For BETT UK 2026 programme information:
uk.bettshow.com

Event Information

BETT UK 2026
📅 Dates: 21-23 January 2026
📍 Venue: ExCeL London, Royal Victoria Dock, 1 Western Gateway, London E16 1XL
🎓 Attendance: FREE for educators
🏆 CPD Accreditation: Provided by The CPD Group (CPD Register Certified)

⏰ Opening Times:

• Wednesday 21 January: Arena doors 08:30, Show closes 18:00
• Thursday 22 January: Arena doors 08:45, Show closes 18:00
• Friday 23 January: Arena doors 08:45, Show closes 17:00
• Exhibition floor opens 10:00 daily

Register Now for Free

About The CPD Register

The CPD Register is a UK based independent Certification Body for CPD Accreditation Organisations. We assess and certify organisations that meet published standards for quality, transparency, and consumer protection in CPD accreditation.

Our certification framework empowers educators to identify credible CPD accreditation and make informed professional development decisions.

Learn More:

• Verify accreditation organisation certification: thecpdregister.com
• Find Certified Organisations: Certification Directory
• Understand quality standards: Our Quality Framework

About The CPD Group

The CPD Group is a CPD Register Certified accreditation organisation providing independent quality assurance for professional development across multiple sectors. They partner with BETT UK 2026 to individually assess and accredit the event's extensive programme.

Visit The CPD Group at Stand SS70 at BETT UK 2026.

About BETT UK

BETT UK is the world's leading education technology event, bringing together 35,000+ education professionals from 130+ countries. Established in 1985 and organised by Hyve Group, BETT supports educators with access to innovation, professional development, and networking.

Learn more: uk.bettshow.com

Contact & Enquiries

For CPD Register certification enquiries: Contact The CPD Register
For BETT UK 2026 registration: uk.bettshow.com

The CPD Register is a certification body for CPD Accreditation Organisations. We do NOT accredit training courses directly—we certify the organisations that provide CPD accreditation, ensuring they meet published quality standards.

#BETT2026 #CPDEvaluation #ProfessionalDevelopment #TeacherTraining #EducationQuality #CPDStandards #EdTech